Claims assessment · Progress claim
We've cut net GHG emissions 24.5% vs our 2018 baseline
Typical treatment across five regimes. Every verdict below is tied to a stated legal hook.
Market comparison
How this claim is typically treated
Five major markets · one reviewed comparison
| Market | Typical treatment | Legal basis | What is required |
|---|---|---|---|
| European UnionEU | Conditional | View legal reasoningUCPD Art. 6; ESRS E1 consistency | Baseline recalculation policy disclosed (acquisitions/divestments); gross vs net (offsets) split; audited figure matching the sustainability statement. |
| United KingdomUK | Conditional | View legal reasoningCMA Code | Baseline integrity; restatements explained. |
| United StatesUS | Conditional | View legal reasoningFTC 260.4/.5 | Net vs gross basis stated; offset share disclosed. |
| CanadaCA | Conditional | View legal reasoningCompetition Act s.74.01(1)(b.1)/(b.2) | Verified inventory supporting the percentage. |
| AustraliaAU | Conditional | The cited source is recorded in the assessment. View legal reasoningACL s.18 | Assured data; baseline policy disclosed. |