Claims assessment · Product claim
Refillable — cuts packaging waste
Typical treatment across five regimes. Every verdict below is tied to a stated legal hook.
Market comparison
How this claim is typically treated
Five major markets · one reviewed comparison
| Market | Typical treatment | Legal basis | What is required |
|---|---|---|---|
| European UnionEU | Conditional | View legal reasoningUCPD | Reuse-rate assumptions stated; LCA vs single-use baseline Define the single-use comparator, functional unit, refill and return rate, number of uses, cleaning and transport assumptions, loss rate and calculation method; demonstrate waste reduction at realistic participation. |
| United KingdomUK | Conditional | View legal reasoningCMA Code | Same Define the single-use comparator, functional unit, refill and return rate, number of uses, cleaning and transport assumptions, loss rate and calculation method; demonstrate waste reduction at realistic participation. |
| United StatesUS | Conditional | View legal reasoningFTC 260.6 | Comparative basis Define the single-use comparator, functional unit, refill and return rate, number of uses, cleaning and transport assumptions, loss rate and calculation method; demonstrate waste reduction at realistic participation. |
| CanadaCA | Conditional | View legal reasonings.74.01(1)(b.1) | Comparative test Define the single-use comparator, functional unit, refill and return rate, number of uses, cleaning and transport assumptions, loss rate and calculation method; demonstrate waste reduction at realistic participation. |
| AustraliaAU | Conditional | The cited source is recorded in the assessment. View legal reasoningACL | Substantiation Define the single-use comparator, functional unit, refill and return rate, number of uses, cleaning and transport assumptions, loss rate and calculation method; demonstrate waste reduction at realistic participation. |