Claims assessment · Entity target
Net-zero supermarket by 2040
Typical treatment across five regimes. Every verdict below is tied to a stated legal hook.
Market comparison
How this claim is typically treated
Five major markets · one reviewed comparison
| Market | Typical treatment | Legal basis | What is required |
|---|---|---|---|
| European UnionEU | Conditional | View legal reasoningEmpCo transition-claim discipline; CSRD/ESRS E1 if in scope | Published transition plan with Scope 1/2/3 boundaries (retail is ~90%+ Scope 3), interim targets, third-party verification. |
| United KingdomUK | Conditional | View legal reasoningCMA Code; BRC roadmap context | Plan + progress reporting; Scope 3 supplier engagement evidenced. |
| United StatesUS | Conditional | View legal reasoningFTC Act s.5; SB 253 reconciliation if >$1bn CA revenue | Plan on file; claims reconcile with any CARB filings. |
| CanadaCA | Conditional | View legal reasoningCompetition Act s.74.01(1)(b.2) | Methodology-based plan substantiation. |
| AustraliaAU | Conditional | View legal reasoningACL s.18; Ch 2M reports if in Group 1/2 | Consistency with mandatory climate statements. |