Claims assessment · Service claim
Net zero flight” / “CO₂-neutral delivery
Typical treatment across five regimes. Every verdict below is tied to a stated legal hook.
Market comparison
How this claim is typically treated
Five major markets · one reviewed comparison
| Market | Typical treatment | Legal basis | What is required |
|---|---|---|---|
| European UnionEU | Prohibited | View legal reasoningEmpCo Annex I pt 4c | Remove offset-based neutrality wording; factual emissions per km/parcel permissible |
| United KingdomUK | Restricted | View legal reasoningCMA Code; ASA rulings on airline/ferry offset ads | Do not imply emission-free travel; disclose SAF vs offset shares |
| United StatesUS | Restricted | View legal reasoningFTC 260.5; AB 1305 | Offset disclosure; avoid absolute 'net zero' for single journey |
| CanadaCA | Restricted | View legal reasonings.74.01(1)(b.1)/(b.2) | ISO 14083-tested methodology; substantiation file |
| AustraliaAU | Restricted | The cited source is recorded in the assessment. View legal reasoningACL s.18; ACCC airline sweep | Prominent qualification; offset reliance disclosed |