Climate policy

Global Stocktake

The Paris Agreement's five-yearly assessment of collective progress toward its long-term goals, established by Article 14 and first concluded at COP28 in 2023.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

The global stocktake is the process under Article 14 of the Paris Agreement by which Parties periodically take stock of the Agreement's implementation to assess collective progress toward its purpose and long-term goals — on mitigation, adaptation, and means of implementation and support. It operates in three phases (information collection and preparation, technical assessment, consideration of outputs), with the first stocktake concluding at COP28 in Dubai in 2023 and further stocktakes every five years thereafter.

References

Overview

What it means

The GST is the engine of the Paris Agreement's ambition mechanism: its findings inform each new round of nationally determined contributions, so that commitments ratchet up rather than stand still. The first stocktake found the world off track for 1. 5 °C and produced the UAE Consensus, including the call to transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems.

How it is used

Governments align NDC updates and long-term strategies with GST outcomes; the secretariat runs synthesis reports and technical dialogues; and non-Party stakeholders contribute evidence through open submissions.

Why it matters

It is the only standing, collective, science-informed checkpoint in the climate regime — the mechanism that converts global goals into periodic political pressure. **Note:** 1237 (process) and 1238 (technical assessment phase) merge into this entry.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.