Climate policy

Fossil Fuel Phase-Out

The deliberate, managed end of fossil fuel production and use, elevated to the centre of international climate policy by the COP28 agreement to transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

Fossil fuel phase-out refers to policies and pathways that progressively eliminate the production and consumption of coal, oil, and gas. The first global stocktake under the Paris Agreement, agreed at COP28 in 2023, called on Parties to contribute to "transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems, in a just, orderly and equitable manner" — the first explicit reference to all fossil fuels in a COP decision.

References

Overview

What it means

For decades, UN climate texts avoided naming fossil fuels. COP28 marked a turning point: the presidency described the outcome as "the beginning of the end" for the fossil fuel era. The decision also called for accelerating the phase-down of unabated coal power and phasing out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies, while leaving the pace and pathway to national governments.

How it is used

Governments debate phase-out dates for coal and internal combustion engines; campaigners track fossil fuel expansion against phase-out commitments; and energy ministries design just-transition plans for fossil-dependent regions and workers.

Why it matters

Phase-out is the central unresolved question of climate policy: modelling shows no pathway consistent with 1. 5 °C without a rapid decline in fossil fuel use, yet production plans in many countries still point in the opposite direction.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.