Ocean · food

Fishing down the food web

The process by which fisheries, having depleted large predatory fish, shift to species ever lower in the food web.

Established (named scientific concept) · Version 0.1

Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yet

Definition

Fishing down the food web describes the tendency of industrial fisheries to deplete large, high-trophic-level species — tuna, cod, groupers, sharks — and then compensate by targeting progressively smaller, shorter-lived species at lower trophic levels, such as sardines, anchovies and invertebrates. The concept was documented by Daniel Pauly and colleagues in the late 1990s ("Fishing Down Aquatic Food Webs"), who showed that the mean trophic level of global landings had declined as top predators were fished out. The trend signals serial depletion masked by apparently stable total catches.

References

American Scientist

industrial fishing depleting top trophic levels, documented shift to lower-trophic species

Overview

What it means

Because low-trophic species are also the forage base for predators, seabirds and marine mammals, fishing down the web risks restructuring entire ecosystems; it also underpins the aquaculture feed question, since much low-trophic catch becomes fishmeal and oil rather than food.

How it is used

Used in fisheries science, marine-conservation advocacy and ecosystem-based management debates; tracked via mean-trophic-level indicators of catch.

Why it matters

It reframes overfishing from a single-stock problem to a food-web problem, motivating ecosystem-based quotas and protection of forage species.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.

No verified experts yet

Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for verification and necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.