Ocean · food

Fisheries management

The regulation and stewardship of fish stocks and fishing activity to keep catches within biologically sustainable limits.

Established · Version 0.1

Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yet

Definition

Fisheries management is the integrated process of information gathering, analysis, planning, decision-making, allocation and enforcement by which authorities regulate fishing to sustain stocks and the benefits they provide. Its classical reference point is maximum sustainable yield (MSY) — the largest catch that can be taken from a stock over an indefinite period without impairing renewal, derived from surplus-production theory — with later variants such as maximum economic yield (MEY) and optimum sustainable yield (OSY) adding economic and social objectives. Instruments include total allowable catches and quotas, effort limits, seasons and area closures, gear rules and rights-based management.

References

ScienceDirect

MSY definition (maximum catch over an indefinite period), surplus-production basis, MEY/OSY variants, criticisms, FAO Cochrane guidebook reference

Overview

What it means

Modern fisheries management is adaptive and ecosystem-based: MSY is now treated as a limit to stay below rather than a target to hit, and management plans increasingly account for food-web effects, bycatch, habitat and climate-driven shifts in stock distribution.

How it is used

Applied through national fisheries administrations, regional fisheries management organisations, the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries and certification schemes such as the MSC.

Why it matters

A large share of assessed stocks is fished at or beyond sustainable limits; effective management is the difference between a renewable food system and sequential depletion.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.

No verified experts yet

Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for verification and necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.