Sustainability measurement & disclosure
ESRS G1
The European Sustainability Reporting Standard setting disclosure requirements on business conduct.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
ESRS G1 is the topical European Sustainability Reporting Standard on business conduct, adopted under Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772. It covers the undertaking's strategy, governance and performance on business-conduct matters, including corporate culture, supplier relationships (including payment practices), corruption and bribery, political engagement and lobbying, and protection of whistle-blowers.
References
standard scope
Delegated Regulation 2023/2772, first set
Overview
What it means
G1 applies the common ESRS structure to governance topics, requiring disclosure of policies (codes of conduct, anti-corruption), incidents and mechanisms. It is the only governance topical standard and applies where business conduct is material — which for most large companies it is.
How it is used
Used by CSRD reporters to disclose integrity and governance practices; connects to anti-corruption law, lobbying registers and supply-chain payment rules.
Why it matters
G1 anchors the 'G' in regulated disclosure, linking sustainability reporting to anti-corruption and political-engagement transparency.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.