Governance, Ethics & Risk
Business ethics
The moral principles guiding business conduct beyond legal minimums — the normative foundation on which corporate sustainability and CSR practice are built.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
The study and practice of moral principles and standards governing conduct in business: what companies and the people within them ought to do, beyond what the law requires. It encompasses questions of fairness, honesty, accountability and responsibility toward stakeholders, and emerged as a distinct field in the 1960s amid rising expectations of corporate social conduct.
References
Definition as moral principles guiding conduct; beyond-legal-obligation character; 1960s origins; core principles (accountability, transparency, fairness); CSR relationship.
Overview
What it means
Business ethics supplies the "why" beneath sustainability's "what": principles such as accountability, transparency and fairness translate into codes of ethics, compliance programmes, whistleblowing channels and governance controls. It differs from law (ethics exceed legal floors) and partially overlaps CSR (ethics concern right conduct; CSR concerns societal contribution).
Ethical failures — fraud, corruption, greenwashing — are treated as governance risks with material financial consequences.
How it is used
Companies operationalise business ethics through codes of conduct, ethics training, ombuds functions and board oversight; ESG "G" metrics, anti-corruption frameworks (UN Global Compact Principle 10, ISO 37001) and investor stewardship assess ethical culture.
Why it matters
Every sustainability commitment ultimately depends on ethical execution; business ethics is the discipline that asks whether conduct matches claims — the front line against greenwashing and corporate hypocrisy.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.