Governance, Ethics & Risk
Early warning system
An integrated system of hazard monitoring, forecasting, risk assessment and communication that enables timely action before disasters strike.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
An early warning system is defined by UNDRR as an integrated system of hazard monitoring, forecasting and prediction, disaster risk assessment, communication and preparedness activities that enables individuals, communities, governments and businesses to take timely action to reduce disaster risk in advance of hazardous events. Effective systems are people-centred and span four elements: risk knowledge, monitoring and forecasting, warning dissemination, and preparedness and response capability.
References
UNDRR definition, four elements, treaty references
Overview
What it means
The connective tissue between forecasting a hazard and people actually moving out of harm's way — a warning that doesn't reach or move people is not a system.
How it is used
Early warning systems are embedded in Sendai Framework Target G (multi-hazard EWS access by 2030) and the Paris Agreement (Article 7. 7c), and are the focus of the UN Early Warnings for All initiative.
Why it matters
Early warning is among the most cost-effective adaptation measures known; coverage gaps persist precisely in the most vulnerable countries.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.