Regulation & International Instruments

Dutch Child Labor Due Diligence Law

The Netherlands' 2019 law requiring companies selling to Dutch consumers to investigate and address child labour throughout their supply chains.

Established · Version 0.1

Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yet

Definition

The Dutch Child Labor Due Diligence Law (Wet Zorgplicht Kinderarbeid), adopted by the Dutch Senate in 2019, obliges companies that sell or supply goods or services to Dutch end-users — regardless of where the company is based — to investigate whether there is reasonable suspicion of child labour in their full supply chain, and if so to draw up and implement an action plan aligned with the UN Guiding Principles or OECD Guidelines, and to submit a due-diligence declaration to the regulator. Child labour is defined by reference to ILO Conventions 138 and 182.

References

TrusTrace

adoption date, company scope, pending status

Overview

What it means

One of Europe's first human-rights due-diligence laws, targeting a single issue (child labour) across the entire value chain.

How it is used

The law's entry into force has been held pending alignment with the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive to avoid overlap; it remains a reference in national HREDD design.

Why it matters

It helped establish the legislative template — investigate, act, declare — later scaled up by French, German and EU-level due-diligence regimes.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.

No verified experts yet

Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for verification and necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.