Human Rights & Social Sustainability

Child labour

Work that children are too young to perform or work that, because of its nature or conditions, harms their health, safety, development or education under applicable international and national standards.

Established · Version master-draft-2026-08-10

Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yet

Definition

Work that children are too young to perform or work that, because of its nature or conditions, harms their health, safety, development or education under applicable international and national standards.

Overview

“A child helping at home is not automatically in child labour. A family setting does not automatically make the work safe. ”

Child labour is one of the most emotionally charged terms in responsible sourcing, and imprecision can weaken the response. Not every task performed by a child is child labour. Age-appropriate, light work that does not harm health, development or schooling may contribute to skills and family life.

The boundary depends on age, hours, hazardousness, educational interference and national law, interpreted against international standards. ILO Convention No. 138 establishes minimum ages for admission to employment and allows limited light work under defined conditions. Convention No.

182 requires urgent action against the worst forms, including slavery-like practices, commercial sexual exploitation, illicit activities and hazardous work likely to harm health, safety or morals.

Hazardous work should not be performed by anyone under eighteen, subject to the limited conditions allowed by national law and the Convention. The distinction is practical, not semantic. A fourteen-year-old doing a short, safe task after school may be in a different situation from a child carrying heavy loads, applying pesticides, using a machete, working at night or missing classes during harvest.

Recording only whether a child 'works on the farm' can overstate benign activity and understate serious harm. Assessment must examine the actual task and context. The latest global estimates, referring to 2024, indicate that nearly 138 million children were in child labour and around 54 million were in hazardous work. Agriculture accounted for about 61 per cent of the total.

The figures show progress from earlier estimates, but they also reveal how deeply child labour remains embedded in rural poverty, informal family production, weak education systems and labour-intensive supply chains. Cocoa in Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana makes the challenge concrete. NORC's assessment of the 2018/19 harvest estimated that about 1.

56 million children were in child labour in cocoa production across the two countries and roughly 1. 48 million were exposed to hazardous work. The numbers do not mean every cocoa farm uses child labour, nor that every task has equal severity. They show the scale at which household economics, production practices and hazardous tasks intersect. Audits alone struggle to see this reality.

Children may work seasonally, outside formal workplaces or on family farms that are not present during an announced visit.

Parents and children may fear losing market access or income if they disclose work. A zero-tolerance policy followed by immediate exclusion can therefore push the problem further from view. Effective systems need confidential identification, referral, remediation, school access and monitoring over time. Prevention also requires examining root causes without using them as excuses.

Poverty, inadequate adult labour, distant schools, migration, discrimination and low farm income can all increase risk. Companies do not control every cause, but purchasing practices, production expectations and programme design may influence household choices. A remediation plan that removes a child from hazardous work without replacing lost income or supporting education may not last.

The discipline is to protect the child rather than protect the claim. Organisations should distinguish permitted light work from child labour, prioritise hazardous and worst forms, and design responses around the child's best interests. Success is not a clean audit or a farmer removed from a list.

It is a child who is safe, learning and no longer compelled into harmful work, with conditions in place to prevent recurrence.

Practical application

Translate international standards into age- and task-specific rules for each sourcing country. Train field teams to assess hours, equipment, chemical exposure, load, timing and school attendance rather than asking only whether children work. Use confidential, child-sensitive channels and protect families from retaliation or automatic exclusion. Establish remediation pathways before cases are found.

Coordinate with schools, social services, worker and farmer organisations and specialist child-protection partners. Track the child's safety and education over time, address household income and adult-labour constraints, and evaluate whether purchasing or production requirements increase risk.

Why it matters

Child labour can damage health, development and education at the stage when those losses may shape an entire life. Accurate definitions allow organisations to focus protection on harmful work without criminalising safe, age-appropriate participation or driving abuse underground.

Common misconception

Any work by a person under eighteen is often labelled child labour, while work on a family farm is sometimes assumed to be harmless. Both positions are wrong. The assessment depends on age, task, hours, hazard, schooling and applicable law; family relationships do not remove risk.

Connections

Decent work concerns the conditions of adult employment and household security that can reduce child-labour pressure. Living income and living wage affect whether families can meet needs without harmful child work. Human rights due diligence requires prevention, identification and remedy, while forced labour applies where coercion or slavery-like conditions are present.

A question worth asking

Does your child-labour system make harmful work easier to disclose and remedy, or does fear of exclusion teach families to hide it more effectively?

Selected references

International Labour Organization. 1973. Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138). International Labour Organization. 1999. Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182). International Labour Organization and UNICEF. 2025. Child Labour: Global Estimates 2024, Trends and the Road Forward. NORC at the University of Chicago. 2020.

Assessing Progress in Reducing Child Labor in Cocoa Production in Cocoa Growing Areas of Cote d'Ivoire and Ghana. International Labour Organization. Child Labour in Agriculture: Guidance and Resources.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.

No verified experts yet

Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

vmaster-draft-2026-08-10

Sign-in supplies your email for verification and necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.