Strategy, Targets & Performance Management
Backcasting
A planning method that starts from a desired future state and works backwards to identify the steps needed to reach it — the opposite of forecasting.
Definition
A planning approach in which a successful future outcome is first imagined, and the question then asked: "what do we need to do today to reach that outcome?" In contrast to forecasting, which projects current trends forward, backcasting defines the endpoint — such as a fully sustainable state or a net-zero target — and derives the pathway backwards from it.
References
Definition vs forecasting; role in strategic sustainable development; The Natural Step's ABCD method based on backcasting from sustainability principles.
Overview
What it means
Backcasting is central to strategic sustainable development because incremental forecasting tends to project today's problems into the future and narrows options to marginal improvements. The Natural Step's framework for strategic sustainable development embeds backcasting from science-based sustainability principles in its ABCD method.
Normative climate scenarios (such as the IEA's Net Zero Emissions scenario) apply the same logic: define the 1. 5°C-consistent endpoint and derive required milestones.
How it is used
Organisations use backcasting for visioning, target-setting and transition planning: set the long-term goal, identify milestones, then plan actions and monitor against the pathway. It is common in municipal sustainability planning, corporate target-setting and national decarbonisation strategies.
Why it matters
Backcasting legitimises ambition: it starts from what is necessary (e. g. climate stability) rather than what currently seems feasible, exposing the gap between trends and goals — the conceptual basis of "ambition gap" analysis.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.
Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.
Contribute to this entry
Help improve this definition
Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.