Sustainability Language

Development, Impact & Global Frameworks

Anticipatory action

Acting ahead of a predicted hazard — using forecasts, pre-agreed triggers and pre-arranged finance — to prevent or reduce humanitarian impacts before they fully unfold.

Established · Version 0.1

Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yet

Definition

Actions taken before a crisis hits to prevent or reduce potential disaster impacts, based on forecasts or predictions of how an event will unfold. Per IASC guidance (2024), anticipatory action works best when activities, trigger thresholds and decision rules are pre-agreed, and pre-arranged funding is released immediately once triggers are met.

References

Overview

What it means

The approach shifts humanitarian response from reacting after disasters to acting before them: cash transfers before floods, livestock protection before droughts, evacuations before cyclones. Its core components are pre-agreed actions and roles, forecast-based triggers combining predictions with exposure and vulnerability data, and pre-arranged financing. It applies to both rapid-onset and slow-onset hazards.

How it is used

The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, WFP, FAO, OCHA and NGO networks such as Start Network run anticipatory action frameworks, pilots and financing mechanisms (including forecast-based financing funds). Triggers are increasingly embedded in national disaster risk financing and social protection systems.

Why it matters

Acting earlier is more dignified and more cost-effective than post-disaster relief, and climate change is increasing the frequency of forecastable extremes. Anticipatory action is becoming a standard expectation in climate adaptation and disaster risk finance policy.

Definitions and controversy

Forecast-based financing (FbF) is a financing mechanism for anticipatory action, not a synonym; candidate 1117 should remain distinct when reached.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.

No verified experts yet

Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.

Endorse this definitionSuggest a revisionSubmit a wider review

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for verification and necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.