Climate & Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Ambition gap
The shortfall between the emissions cuts countries have pledged and the reductions needed to meet the Paris Agreement's temperature goals.
Definition
The difference between collective climate ambition — as expressed in nationally determined contributions (NDCs) — and the emissions pathway required for the Paris goals. UNEP's Emissions Gap Report 2025 estimates that full implementation of current NDCs implies 2.3–2.5°C of warming this century, versus 2.8°C under current policies; aligning with 1.5°C requires emissions 55% below 2019 levels by 2035.
References
2.3–2.5°C under full NDC implementation vs 2.8°C current policies; 35%/55% cuts needed by 2035 for 2°C/1.5°C.
Implementation gap; 60 Parties covering 63% of emissions had new NDCs by 30 Sep 2025; 2024 emissions 57.7 GtCO₂e.
Net-zero pledges now covering ~70% of emissions; interpretation of trends.
Overview
What it means
The ambition gap is usually presented alongside an "implementation gap" — the difference between pledges and the policies actually in place. Both are quantified annually by UNEP's Emissions Gap Report series. The 2025 report noted that methodological updates and the announced US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement accounted for much of the apparent improvement, meaning new pledges "barely moved the needle".
How it is used
The gap frames the ratchet cycle of the Paris Agreement: each five-year NDC round is assessed against it, and it anchors calls for stronger 2035 targets. Governments, negotiators and media use UNEP's figures to judge whether the world is "on track".
Why it matters
The ambition gap converts abstract temperature goals into a concrete annual shortfall, showing how much faster and deeper cuts must be. It also exposes the credibility problem of climate diplomacy when pledges, policies and required trajectories diverge.
Definitions and controversy
Terminology varies — "ambition gap", "emissions gap" and "implementation gap" overlap; UNEP's annual report is titled *Emissions Gap Report*. Figures are model-dependent and revised yearly.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.
Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.
Contribute to this entry
Help improve this definition
Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.