Climate & Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Adaptation gap
The difference between what is needed for adequate climate adaptation — in finance, planning and implementation — and what is actually being provided or done.
Definition
The shortfall between estimated adaptation needs and current adaptation action, most prominently measured in finance. UNEP's Adaptation Gap Report 2025 puts developing countries' adaptation costs at USD 310–365 billion per year to 2035, against international public adaptation finance flows of USD 26 billion in 2023 — a finance gap of USD 284–339 billion a year.
References
Costs of USD 310bn (modelled) to USD 365bn (NDC/NAP-extrapolated) per year by 2035; USD 26bn flows in 2023; 12–14× gap; Glasgow goal off track.
USD 284–339bn annual finance gap; NCQG insufficiency; Paris Article 9 balance commitment.
Overview
What it means
The gap has three dimensions: finance (needs estimated at 12–14 times current flows), planning (most countries now have at least one national adaptation policy, strategy or plan) and implementation (progress, but limited; over 1,600 implemented adaptation actions were reported in the 2025 assessment). The Glasgow Climate Pact goal of doubling 2019 adaptation finance by 2025 is off track under current trends.
How it is used
UNEP has published the Adaptation Gap Report series since 2014 to inform UNFCCC negotiations ahead of each COP. Governments, civil society and media cite its figures in debates over the new collective quantified goal on climate finance (NCQG) and the adequacy of adaptation support.
Why it matters
The adaptation gap quantifies how far climate-vulnerable countries are from the resources their stated plans require. Its persistence — and the growing share of non-concessional, debt-based instruments within adaptation finance — raises equity concerns, since the countries most exposed to impacts contributed least to causing them.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.
Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.
Contribute to this entry
Help improve this definition
Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.