Claims assessment · Entity claim
Net positive” (give-back framing)
Typical treatment across five regimes. Every verdict below is tied to a stated legal hook.
Market comparison
How this claim is typically treated
Five major markets · one reviewed comparison
| Market | Typical treatment | Legal basis | What is required |
|---|---|---|---|
| European UnionEU | Restricted | View legal reasoningEmpCo Annex I; UCPD Art. 6 | Generic superiority claim — requires demonstrated recognised excellent performance; 'net positive' accounting methodology must be published. |
| United KingdomUK | Restricted | View legal reasoningCMA Code | Net-impact accounting methodology disclosed; high ASA risk. |
| United StatesUS | Conditional | View legal reasoningFTC 260.4 | Full-lifecycle netting evidence incl. offsets quality. |
| CanadaCA | Restricted | View legal reasoningCompetition Act s.74.01(1)(b.2) | Recognised methodology netting required. |
| AustraliaAU | Restricted | The cited source is recorded in the assessment. View legal reasoningACL s.18 | Netting methodology and data on file. |