Sustainable finance

PCAF Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard

The global standard developed by the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials for measuring and disclosing the emissions financed by loans and investments.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

The Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard for the Financial Industry, developed by the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF), provides harmonised methodologies for financial institutions to measure and disclose greenhouse gas emissions associated with their loans, investments, capital market activities and insurance underwriting — reported as Scope 3 Category 15 under the GHG Protocol. The third edition of Part A (financed emissions) was published in December 2025.

References

PCAF

standard structure, editions and asset class coverage

GHG Protocol

conformance with Scope 3 Category 15 and initiative history

Overview

What it means

For most banks and asset managers, financed emissions dwarf operational emissions. The PCAF Standard covers ten asset classes, attributes emissions in proportion to the institution's share of financing, and scores data quality on a five-level scale; Parts B and C address facilitated and insurance-associated emissions.

How it is used

More than 700 financial institutions with tens of trillions of dollars in assets apply the standard for disclosures, target setting and climate risk analysis; regulators and frameworks including ESRS reference PCAF methodologies.

Why it matters

Financed emissions are the main channel through which finance drives climate impact; a common measurement standard is a precondition for credible net zero commitments by financial institutions. **Note:** Serves as the merge target for ID 1993 (Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials).

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.