Social equity and labour

Pay Equity

The principle that workers should receive equal pay for equal work or work of equal value, irrespective of gender, ethnicity or other characteristics.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

Pay equity is the principle and practice of ensuring that employees receive equal remuneration for work of equal value, without discrimination on grounds such as gender or ethnicity. It encompasses legal obligations (equal pay law), analytical methods (pay equity analyses measuring unexplained gaps) and disclosure metrics such as gender pay gap reporting and CEO-to-median-worker pay ratios.

References

Overview

What it means

Pay equity analysis distinguishes explained pay differences (role, experience, performance) from unexplained gaps that may indicate discrimination. The adjusted gap is the discrimination-relevant figure; the unadjusted (median) gap reveals structural under-representation in higher-paid roles.

Both are now commonly disclosed, and pay transparency laws in the EU and elsewhere are pushing employers from reporting toward remediation.

How it is used

Employers conduct pay equity audits; regulators require gap reporting (e. g. , UK gender pay gap rules, EU Pay Transparency Directive); investors use pay ratio and gap data in social assessment and engagement.

Why it matters

Pay gaps compound over careers into pension and wealth gaps; pay equity is both a fundamental fairness issue and a measurable indicator of whether workplaces deliver social sustainability in practice. **Note:** Serves as the merge target for IDs 2002 (Pay equity analysis) and 2003 (CEO-to-median pay ratio).

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.