Governance and methods

Participatory Approach

Approaches that actively involve stakeholders and communities in decisions, planning and implementation rather than treating them as passive recipients.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

A participatory approach involves the people affected by a decision, project or policy in shaping it — through consultation, co-design, joint decision-making or community control. In sustainability it spans participatory planning of land and resources, participatory communication for behaviour and policy change, and community-based management of forests, water and fisheries.

References

FAO

definition and application areas

Overview

What it means

Participation ranges along a spectrum from information-giving to full devolved control; only higher rungs shift real power. Done well, participation improves outcomes by incorporating local knowledge and building legitimacy; done as a box-ticking exercise, it breeds cynicism and can mask top-down decisions.

How it is used

Participation is embedded in environmental impact assessment, FPIC (free, prior and informed consent), local Agenda 21 processes, participatory budgeting and co-management regimes; development agencies and conservation NGOs maintain formal participatory toolkits.

Why it matters

Decisions about land, resources and risk imposed without participation frequently fail or provoke conflict; participatory approaches are both an effectiveness strategy and a matter of rights and justice. **Note:** Serves as the merge target for IDs 1991 (Participatory communication) and 1992 (Participatory planning).

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.