Carbon markets

Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (PACM)

The UN-supervised carbon crediting mechanism under Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement, successor to the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

The Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism is the carbon crediting mechanism established by Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement, supervised by the Article 6.4 Supervisory Body. It issues credits (A6.4ERs) for verified emission reductions and removals, with corresponding adjustments applied when credits are transferred internationally to avoid double counting toward national targets.

References

UNFCCC

mandate, governance and operational status

Abatable

2025–2026 methodology and accreditation progress

Overview

What it means

PACM succeeds the Clean Development Mechanism, with strengthened integrity provisions including mandatory contributions to adaptation finance and overall mitigation. Rules were agreed at COP26 and refined subsequently; the Supervisory Body approved its first methodology and accredited the first verification entities in 2025, with full operationalisation and credit issuance progressing through 2026.

How it is used

Countries may use PACM credits toward their NDCs; companies and other buyers may purchase them for voluntary use, subject to evolving claims guidance. Host countries authorise credits and apply corresponding adjustments.

Why it matters

PACM is the UN's answer to carbon market integrity after the CDM's troubled legacy; whether it delivers real, additional reductions will shape the credibility of international carbon trading under the Paris Agreement.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.