Food safety & agriculture

Maximum Residue Level (MRL)

The highest concentration of a pesticide residue legally tolerated in or on food or feed when the pesticide is applied according to Good Agricultural Practice.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

A maximum residue level (MRL) is the highest level of a pesticide residue legally tolerated in or on food or feed when pesticides are applied correctly following Good Agricultural Practice. In the EU, MRLs are set under Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 for all agricultural products, with a general default of 0.01 mg/kg where no specific level exists; EFSA assesses consumer risk, and Codex Alimentarius sets international MRLs (CXLs) used in trade.

References

Overview

What it means

MRLs are market-access standards: produce exceeding them cannot legally be sold. They reflect authorised use patterns and toxicological safety, and import tolerances extend them to residues from uses legal only in exporting countries — a live trade-policy issue.

How it is used

Farmers follow label rates and pre-harvest intervals to comply; enforcement laboratories test consignments; exporters to the EU and elsewhere must certify compliance.

Why it matters

MRLs are the operational line between agricultural productivity and consumer safety, and a flashpoint in debates over pesticide reduction, trade fairness and the transition to sustainable crop protection.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.