Climate governance

Marrakech Partnership for Global Climate Action

The UNFCCC framework launched at COP22 in 2016 to mobilise businesses, cities, regions and investors behind the Paris Agreement, steered by the High-Level Champions.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

The Marrakech Partnership for Global Climate Action is the UNFCCC's framework for enhancing pre-2020 and ongoing ambition through action by non-Party stakeholders — companies, cities, regions, investors and civil society — launched at COP22 in Marrakech in 2016. It is guided by the High-Level Climate Champions and underpins campaigns such as Race to Zero and Race to Resilience, with its mandate renewed for 2026–2030.

References

UNFCCC

COP22 launch, High-Level Champions, campaigns, 2026–2030 renewal

Overview

What it means

The Partnership institutionalised the role of "non-state actors" in the climate regime: their commitments are tracked (e. g. , via the Global Climate Action Portal) and organised around sectoral pathways aligned with halving emissions by 2030.

How it is used

Companies and cities join Race to Zero through partner initiatives; COP action agendas, thematic days and yearbooks of climate action are delivered under the Partnership umbrella.

Why it matters

It is the main bridge between national climate targets and the real-economy actors who must deliver them — and the accountability structure keeping voluntary net-zero pledges visible. **Note:** Workbook suggested Reject; drafted as a new entry because it is a named UNFCCC framework (consistent with treatment of the Katowice and Koronivia processes).

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.