Climate economics

Marginal Abatement Cost (MAC)

The cost of reducing one additional tonne of greenhouse gas emissions; plotted across measures, it forms the marginal abatement cost curve ranking options from cheapest to dearest.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

Marginal abatement cost is the incremental cost of avoiding one additional unit (typically a tonne of CO2-equivalent) of emissions with a given measure, compared with a baseline. Arranging measures in ascending cost order produces the marginal abatement cost curve (MACC), popularised by McKinsey's 2007 global curve and since expanded to cover more than a thousand abatement levers.

References

Overview

What it means

Options left of the zero line (insulation, efficient lighting) have negative cost — they save money. The curve shows how much abatement is available at or below any carbon price, and where policy must push.

How it is used

Governments and companies use MACCs to prioritise decarbonisation portfolios, set internal carbon prices and compare sector pathways; critics note curves omit transaction costs, co-benefits and dynamic effects.

Why it matters

MAC thinking underpins cost-effective climate policy: it reveals that deep cuts are often cheaper than assumed and identifies the most economical sequence of action. **Note:** In-batch merges: 1703 and 1704 (marginal abatement cost duplicates) → this entry.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.