Climate finance & governance

Loss and Damage Fund

The UN climate fund agreed at COP27 (2022) and operationalised at COP28 (2023) to channel finance to developing countries facing climate impacts beyond adaptation limits.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

The Loss and Damage Fund (formally the Fund for responding to Loss and Damage, FRLD) is a dedicated financial mechanism under the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement, agreed at COP27 in Sharm el-Sheikh in 2022 and operationalised at COP28 in Dubai in 2023, to provide finance to particularly vulnerable developing countries for addressing economic and non-economic loss and damage from climate change. It is hosted at the World Bank as an interim financial intermediary fund for four years, with initial pledges of several hundred million dollars and provisions reserving at least 50% of resources for small island developing states and least developed countries.

References

Overview

What it means

The fund answers a three-decade demand from vulnerable nations for compensation-style finance distinct from mitigation and adaptation funding. Its board, based in Barbados under the Implementation Modalities, is developing direct access and rapid disbursement windows.

How it is used

Governments and civil society track pledges and capitalisation; the fund's first calls for funding requests mark the shift from political agreement to delivery.

Why it matters

Loss and damage finance is a litmus test for climate justice: countries least responsible for emissions face the severest impacts, and the fund's adequacy and accessibility shape trust in the entire climate regime.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.