Ethics & foresight
Long-termism
An ethical view, associated with effective altruism philosophers, holding that positively influencing the long-term future is a key moral priority because future people matter morally.
Definition
Long-termism is the ethical position, developed within the effective altruism movement by philosophers such as Toby Ord and William MacAskill, that the primary determinant of an action's value is its effect on the very long-run future. Because vast numbers of future people could exist, safeguarding humanity's long-term potential — especially against existential risks — is argued to be a central moral priority.
References
definition, Ord and MacAskill, effective altruism association
Overview
What it means
The view combines moral impartiality toward future generations with expected-value reasoning about large-scale, low-probability risks (AI catastrophe, engineered pandemics, extreme climate change) and opportunities to shape civilisational trajectories.
How it is used
Long-termism informs philanthropy, research agendas and policy advocacy on existential risk, biosecurity and AI governance, and connects to sustainability debates on intergenerational equity — though critics warn it can discount present-day suffering and near-term environmental harms.
Why it matters
It has become influential in how substantial philanthropic and research resources are allocated toward long-horizon risks, making it a live concept in sustainability and futures ethics discussions.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.
Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.
Contribute to this entry
Help improve this definition
Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.