Environment

LC3 (Limestone Calcined Clay Cement)

A low-carbon cement blending calcined clay and limestone to replace about half of conventional clinker, cutting CO₂ emissions by up to roughly 40%.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) is a ternary blended cement in which calcined clay and ground limestone jointly substitute around 50% of Portland clinker (typical LC3-50 formulation: 50% clinker, 30% calcined clay, 15% limestone, 5% gypsum). It achieves roughly 30–40% lower CO₂ emissions than ordinary Portland cement with comparable mechanical performance, and can be produced in existing plants.

References

LC3 Project (EPFL)

Definition, up-to-40% CO₂ reduction, low-grade clay suitability, plant compatibility

PMC (NCBI)

50% clinker substitution, EN 197-5:2021 inclusion, performance parity

Overview

What it means

Clinker production is the source of most cement emissions (cement accounts for roughly 8% of global CO₂), so deep clinker substitution is the sector's principal near-term decarbonisation lever. Calcined clay fires at about 800 °C rather than clinker's ~1450 °C, and both clay and limestone are abundant — including low-grade clays — making LC3 scalable where traditional substitutes (fly ash, slag) are declining.

LC3 was recognised in European standard EN 197-5:2021 (cement type II/C-M) and shows strong chloride resistance, aiding durability in coastal structures.

How it is used

LC3 is entering commercial production, promoted by the EPFL-led LC3 Project with Swiss development funding, and is assessed in procurement, codes and life-cycle assessments as a Portland-cement alternative.

Why it matters

It is one of the few immediately scalable, cost-effective routes to deep cuts in construction-sector emissions.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.