Governance

Key risk indicator

A measurable, forward-looking metric that warns of rising risk exposure before losses occur.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

A key risk indicator (KRI) is a quantifiable metric used to monitor potential threats to an organisation's objectives and to provide early warning of changing risk exposure. Where key performance indicators measure how well things are going, KRIs look forward to where things could go wrong, triggering action when values breach defined thresholds.

References

Eide Bailly

Forward-looking perspective and risk-mitigation purpose

Overview

What it means

KRIs sit inside enterprise risk management as the monitoring layer between risk assessment and response. A well-designed KRI is linked to a specific risk driver, has an escalation threshold, and is reviewed as conditions evolve — examples include liquidity headroom, supplier concentration, overdue safety actions or climate value-at-risk for climate-exposed portfolios.

How it is used

Risk, finance, compliance and sustainability teams track KRIs on dashboards alongside KPIs; in sustainability contexts, KRIs monitor emerging ESG risks such as regulatory exposure, physical climate hazards and supply-chain labour issues.

Why it matters

KRIs convert risk management from post-incident reaction to anticipatory control, which is the essence of resilience.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.