Climate

Katowice Climate Package

The set of operational rules for implementing the Paris Agreement adopted at COP24 in Katowice, Poland, in December 2018.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

The Katowice Climate Package is the bundle of decisions adopted at the 24th Conference of the Parties (COP24, Katowice, 2018) that operationalised most of the 2015 Paris Agreement. Often called the Paris Rulebook, it set common modalities, procedures and guidelines for nationally determined contributions, the enhanced transparency framework, the global stocktake, adaptation communications, finance reporting and the implementation and compliance committee.

References

ClimateHero

COP24 adoption, rulebook contents, unresolved carbon-market issue settled at COP26

Overview

What it means

The Paris Agreement established goals but left their machinery to later negotiation. Katowice supplied most of that machinery — notably common rules for how countries report emissions, progress and support under the transparency framework — so that pledges could be compared, tracked and reviewed.

Agreement on international carbon-market rules (Article 6) was not reached there and was only finalised at COP26 in Glasgow in 2021.

How it is used

Parties apply the Katowice guidelines when preparing NDCs, biennial transparency reports and long-term strategies, and when participating in the global stocktake; the package underpins the Paris Agreement's accountability architecture.

Why it matters

Without the rulebook, the Paris Agreement would be aspirational rather than implementable; Katowice made collective monitoring of climate action possible.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.