Climate

Just Energy Transition Partnership

A climate-finance model in which developed-country partner groups pledge funding to help an emerging economy accelerate its shift away from coal towards clean energy.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

A Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) is a political agreement between a group of developed countries (an International Partner Group) and a developing or emerging economy, in which the partners commit public and private finance — grants, concessional loans, commercial debt and equity — to accelerate the recipient's decarbonisation, initially centred on coal phase-out, while supporting affected workers and communities.

References

Overview

What it means

The model was launched with South Africa at COP26 in 2021 (a pledged USD 8. 5 billion) and extended to Indonesia and Viet Nam (2022) and Senegal (2023), the latter shifting emphasis towards clean-energy access.

Recipients set out investment plans; pledges are then disbursed through a mix of instruments that critics note contains relatively little grant funding (around 3–4%), raising debt and "justness" concerns, alongside calls for greater transparency and community participation.

How it is used

JETPs structure country-level climate finance packages and are a reference point in debates on how to fund coal retirement, grid expansion and just-transition measures in coal-dependent economies.

Why it matters

JETPs are among the largest targeted climate-finance commitments ever made and test whether international finance can deliver transitions that are both fast and fair.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.