Inclusive business & employment

Impact Sourcing

The business practice of intentionally hiring and developing workers from disadvantaged communities in business process and IT services delivery.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

Impact sourcing is a procurement and employment practice in which companies intentionally hire people from disadvantaged groups — such as low-income, rural, or marginalised communities — into business process services and IT work, providing career paths, fair wages, and transferable skills. Developed with support from the Rockefeller Foundation and promoted by the Global Impact Sourcing Coalition, it treats service outsourcing as a deliberate job-creation and inclusion mechanism rather than purely a cost decision.

References

Overview

What it means

Impact sourcing sits between corporate social responsibility and core procurement: the jobs are real commercial work — data services, customer support, back-office processing — but supplier selection is used to direct opportunity toward workers excluded from formal employment.

Evidence cited by practitioners includes lower attrition and engaged workforces, which is why the model is argued on business as well as social terms. It connects supply-chain sustainability to the "S" in ESG through purchasing decisions.

How it is used

Applied in BPO/ITO procurement, supplier diversity programmes, and inclusive-business strategies; tracked by industry groups with job-creation commitments.

Why it matters

It shows how routine buying decisions can be redesigned to distribute the gains of the digital economy more fairly.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.