Impact finance

Impact Bond

An outcomes-based financing arrangement in which private investors fund social or environmental services upfront and are repaid by an outcome funder only if agreed results are achieved.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

An impact bond is a financing mechanism in which investors provide upfront capital for an intervention and a government, donor, or other outcome funder repays them — with a return — only if independently verified outcomes are achieved. Despite the name, impact bonds are not tradable debt securities but contractual partnerships; social impact bonds address domestic social services, while development impact bonds apply the model in low- and middle-income countries. The first SIB was launched at Peterborough prison, UK, in 2010.

References

OECD

definition and mechanism

OECD

typology and evidence

Overview

What it means

Impact bonds transfer performance risk from funders to investors: money follows verified results, not activities. This sharpens focus on outcomes and invites private capital into public goals, but the structures are complex, transaction costs high, and the evidence on whether they outperform traditional funding is mixed.

They sit within the broader family of outcomes-based financing alongside results-based contracts and outcomes funds.

How it is used

Used in employment, health, recidivism, education, and conservation programmes; tracked by OECD and the Brookings Global Impact Bonds Database.

Why it matters

Impact bonds are the most ambitious attempt yet to make public and development spending pay only for what works.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.