Behavioural economics

Hyperbolic Discounting

The tendency to discount near-term outcomes far more steeply than distant ones — a behavioural pattern that undermines long-horizon decisions like climate action and saving.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

Hyperbolic discounting is a pattern of time preference in which people apply disproportionately high discount rates to short delays and lower rates to long delays, producing preferences that reverse over time — choosing a smaller-sooner reward today yet preferring a larger-later one when both are pushed into the future. Unlike the exponential discounting assumed in standard economics, it matches observed human behaviour and explains procrastination, under-saving, and short-termism.

References

Overview

What it means

Sustainability problems are structurally hyperbolic: the costs of action are immediate, the benefits deferred. Present bias helps explain why societies underinvest in climate mitigation, building retrofits, and prevention even when long-run returns are large — and why commitment devices, defaults, and binding targets (which lock in the future self's preferred choice) are effective policy responses.

It also informs debates over the social discount rate used to value future climate damages.

How it is used

The concept appears in behavioural public policy, climate-economics debates over discounting, and the design of incentives and defaults.

Why it matters

It names the psychological engine of short-termism — sustainability's most persistent adversary.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.