Assurance & compliance

Hybrid Audit

An audit combining remote, ICT-assisted evidence-gathering with an in-person site visit — normalised across certification and social-compliance schemes after COVID-19.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

A hybrid audit is an audit that combines remote methods — typically desk-based document review, video interviews, and ICT-assisted verification — with in-person on-site inspection, either within a single engagement or in sequence, with the site visit used to verify what remote review cannot establish. The approach expanded rapidly during COVID-19 travel restrictions and has been retained where it cuts cost without materially reducing assurance.

References

OECD

definition and terminology landscape

Overview

What it means

Hybrid design is a trade-off: remote stages handle records and interviews efficiently, while physical presence remains essential for what auditors must see — working conditions, safety controls, and unscripted worker interviews. In social-compliance auditing, schemes differ on how much can be remote; unannounced and fully on-site audits remain the benchmark where deception risk is high.

OECD work on remote audits notes the terminology is still inconsistent across schemes.

How it is used

Used in management-system certification, food-safety auditing, and supply-chain social audits as a cost- and access-management tool.

Why it matters

Assurance credibility underpins every claim in this dictionary; understanding audit design is understanding how much trust a certificate deserves.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.