Forests & land use
High Forest, Low Deforestation (HFLD)
Countries or jurisdictions with high forest cover and historically low deforestation rates, seeking recognition and finance within REDD+ for keeping forests standing.
Definition
High forest, low deforestation describes countries or jurisdictions that retain large shares of their original forest cover — commonly operationalised as more than 50 per cent forest cover with annual deforestation below about 0.22 per cent — and therefore have little historical deforestation on which to base traditional REDD+ credits. Roughly three dozen countries, including Suriname, Guyana, and Gabon, meet the definition and collectively hold a major share of remaining tropical forest carbon.
References
category definition and policy problem
operational thresholds
Overview
What it means
HFLD countries face a paradox: REDD+ was designed to reward reductions against a deforestation baseline, but HFLD jurisdictions have almost no baseline to reduce — so conservation success goes unrewarded while the economic logic of clearing forests intensifies. Crediting approaches such as ART-TREES's HFLD module attempt to fix this by scoring jurisdictions on maintained forest cover, not just avoided emissions.
How it is used
The category shapes forest-finance negotiations, jurisdictional REDD+ crediting, and Article 6 discussions on rewarding standing forests.
Why it matters
The last large intact forests are the hardest to protect precisely because current finance only pays for stopping destruction already underway. **Note:** 1352 HFLD aliases to this entry.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.
Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.
Contribute to this entry
Help improve this definition
Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.