Development finance

Grant Equivalent

The OECD DAC's standard measure of donor effort in official development assistance: the present-value "gift portion" of a loan or grant compared with lending at market terms.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

The grant equivalent is an estimate, in today's value of money, of how much is being given away over the life of a financial transaction compared with a transaction at market terms — the grant element expressed as a monetary value. Since reporting on 2018 data, the OECD Development Assistance Committee has used the grant equivalent system as the headline measure of official development assistance, replacing the older net-flow basis.

References

OECD

definition and system

Overview

What it means

Under the old system, a loan's full face value counted as aid and repayments were deducted later; under grant equivalent accounting, only the concessional portion counts — the more generous the loan's terms, the higher the ODA credit. Minimum grant-element thresholds for ODA eligibility now differ by borrower income group (45% for LDCs and other LICs, 15% for LMICs, 10% for UMICs).

How it is used

The DAC publishes headline ODA figures on a grant equivalent basis; analysts use it to compare genuine donor effort; and the methodology shapes lending terms toward greater concessionality for poorer countries.

Why it matters

How aid is measured determines what donors are rewarded for providing; the grant equivalent system aligns the metric with actual generosity. **Note:** Confidence Medium: a technical measurement term, drafted because it is defined and bounded within development-finance reporting.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.