Carbon accounting
GHG Protocol
The global standard framework for measuring and reporting greenhouse gas emissions, created by WRI and WBCSD, whose Scope 1, 2, and 3 structure underpins virtually all corporate carbon accounting.
Definition
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol is the international standard for greenhouse gas accounting and reporting, created by the World Resources Institute and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a partnership launched in 1998. Its Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (first published 2001) categorises emissions into Scope 1 (direct), Scope 2 (purchased energy), and Scope 3 (value chain, 15 categories), with additional standards for products, projects, cities, and policies.
References
Overview
What it means
The Protocol is the de facto grammar of corporate climate disclosure: in 2016, 92% of Fortune 500 companies reporting to CDP used it directly or through programmes based on it. Its five accounting principles — relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy — and its scope framework are embedded in CDP, SBTi, ISSB, and CSRD requirements.
How it is used
Companies follow the standards to build inventories and set targets; assurance providers audit against them; and regulators reference them in mandatory disclosure regimes worldwide.
Why it matters
Without a common accounting language, corporate climate claims are incomparable; the GHG Protocol is what makes net-zero commitments auditable in principle. **Note:** 1200 GHG Protocol Corporate Standard merges into this entry as the flagship standard within the Protocol family.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.
Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.
Contribute to this entry
Help improve this definition
Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.