Reporting, Disclosure & Frameworks

General Disclosure Requirements (GDRs)

General Disclosure Requirements are cross-cutting requirements for reporting policies, actions, targets and metrics consistently across material sustainability matters.

Established · Version 0.1

Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yet

Definition

General Disclosure Requirements (GDRs) are cross-cutting disclosure requirements that establish common information to be reported about policies, actions, targets and metrics associated with material sustainability matters.

Overview

What it means in practice

A cross-cutting requirement avoids repeating the same instructions in every topical standard. The reporter applies the common structure to each material matter and then adds topic-specific information where required.

Why it matters

GDRs make reports more coherent and comparable, but moving details out of topical standards can also make important information less visible unless cross-references are clear.

Terminology note

Earlier ESRS drafting used Minimum Disclosure Requirements. Readers should record the version and legal text being applied rather than assuming the two labels are interchangeable in every context.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.

No verified experts yet

Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for verification and necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.