Social equity & finance

Gender Pension Gap

The difference in pension income between women and men in retirement, reflecting lifetime gaps in pay, employment, and caring responsibilities — around 40% in the EU.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

The gender pension gap is the percentage difference between the average pension income of women and men in retirement. It accumulates the effects of the gender pay gap, part-time and interrupted careers, informal caring, and pension-system design; a European Parliament resolution put the EU gap at about 40% and called for an EU-level strategy to close it.

References

Overview

What it means

Even where pay gaps narrow, pension gaps persist because they compound decades of labour-market inequality: lower contributions, missing contribution years for childcare or eldercare, and survivor and accrual rules built around a single-breadwinner model. The result is a higher risk of poverty in old age for women, who also live longer on average.

How it is used

The gap is tracked by EU institutions and national equality bodies; it informs pension reform, care-policy design, and debates on crediting care periods in pension systems.

Why it matters

It is the end point of gender inequality across the life course — the gap that remains when all the others have had a lifetime to accumulate.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.