Social equity & governance

Gender Mainstreaming

The UN-endorsed strategy of assessing the implications for women and men of any planned action — legislation, policy, or programme — at all levels, so that both benefit equally.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

Gender mainstreaming is "the process of assessing the implications for women and men of any planned action, including legislation, policies or programmes, in all areas and at all levels", as defined by ECOSOC Agreed Conclusions 1997/2. It is a strategy for making women's as well as men's concerns and experiences an integral dimension of design, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation so that inequality is not perpetuated; the ultimate goal is gender equality.

References

Overview

What it means

Rather than confining gender to a specialist unit or women-only projects, mainstreaming makes gender analysis a routine part of every decision — budgets, infrastructure, climate policy, procurement. Endorsed at the 1995 Beijing conference and defined by ECOSOC in 1997, it explicitly does not replace targeted, women-specific measures but complements them.

How it is used

Governments, UN agencies, development banks, and companies adopt gender-mainstreaming policies, appoint focal points, run gender impact assessments, and report against system-wide action plans such as UN-SWAP.

Why it matters

Policies built on an assumed gender-neutral world reproduce inequality by default; mainstreaming is the standard institutional remedy, and underpins gender-responsive climate action under the UNFCCC. **Note:** 1179 and 1182 merge into this entry as phrasing variants of the same strategy.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.