Carbon markets

Free Allocation

The distribution of emissions allowances to covered installations at no cost, used in emissions trading systems as an alternative to auctioning, chiefly to shield trade-exposed industries from carbon leakage.

Established · Version 0.1

Definition

Free allocation is the granting of emissions allowances to installations or companies without charge under an emissions trading system. In the EU ETS, auctioning has been the default method since 2013 — with up to 57% of general allowances auctioned over 2021–2030 — but sectors deemed at risk of carbon leakage continue to receive free allocation, largely benchmarked against the most efficient installations.

References

ICAP

benchmarking method

Overview

What it means

Free allocation protects competitiveness by giving emitters allowances they would otherwise have to buy, but it blunts the carbon price signal and has been criticised for generating windfall profits when companies passed on the notional cost of free allowances to consumers. Allocation based on benchmarks is intended to reward efficiency rather than historical emissions.

How it is used

Policymakers calibrate free allocation shares and benchmarks in ETS design; the EU is phasing out free allocation for sectors covered by the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism; and analysts compare allocation rules across trading systems worldwide.

Why it matters

How allowances are distributed determines who pays for decarbonisation, how strong the incentive to abate is, and whether ETS revenues are raised for public use.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.

No editor-accepted reviews yet

Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.

Contribute to this entry

Help improve this definition

Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.

How review works

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in to your account before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in to your account before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.