Materials · waste
Fly ash
The fine, glassy residue captured from pulverised-coal flue gases, widely reused as a cement and concrete ingredient.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
Fly ash is the finely divided mineral residue carried out of the boiler with flue gases when pulverised coal is burned, captured by electrostatic precipitators or baghouses. Chemically rich in silicates and aluminates, it is pozzolanic — it reacts with calcium hydroxide in the presence of water to form cementitious compounds — making it a standard supplementary cementitious material that can replace a substantial share of Portland cement in concrete. Together with flue-gas desulphurisation gypsum in wallboard, fly ash in concrete accounts for about half of the beneficial use of coal combustion residuals in the United States, where the Bevill amendment shaped their regulatory treatment.
References
definition as finely divided residue of pulverised-coal combustion, pozzolanic properties, capture by precipitators/baghouses
~50% of beneficial use as fly ash in concrete plus FGD gypsum in wallboard, Bevill amendment context
Overview
What it means
Fly ash is both a waste-liability problem (storage in ash ponds has caused major spills and groundwater contamination) and a circular-economy resource: each tonne used in concrete avoids roughly a tonne of clinker-related emissions. Declining coal generation is shrinking supply, prompting interest in harvested ash from legacy ponds.
How it is used
Used in concrete and cement, structural fills and waste-stabilisation; regulated as coal combustion residuals with disposal and beneficial-use rules.
Why it matters
It links three sustainability agendas — coal-phaseout legacies, construction decarbonisation and industrial by-product valorisation — in one material stream.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.