Capitals · reporting

Financial Capital

The pool of funds available to an organisation — equity, debt, grants, retained earnings — treated as one of the six capitals in integrated reporting.

Established · Version 0.1

Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yet

Definition

Financial capital is, in the International <IR> Framework, the pool of funds available to an organisation for use in the production of goods or the provision of services, obtained through financing — such as debt, equity or grants — or generated through operations or investments. It is one of six capitals (financial, manufactured, intellectual, human, social and relationship, and natural) whose stocks and flows integrated reporting asks organisations to account for when explaining how they create, preserve or erode value over time. The Framework is maintained under the IFRS Foundation by the IASB and ISSB and is used in 75 countries.

References

IFRS Foundation

six-capitals list, providers of financial capital as primary audience, IASB/ISSB stewardship, 75-country adoption

Overview

What it means

Treating financial capital as one capital among six reframes the provider-of-capital relationship: financial capital is both an input other capitals are stewarded for and a product of their combined performance. This underwrites the integrated-reporting claim that financial statements alone cannot describe value creation.

How it is used

Used in integrated reports, capitals-based strategy and natural/social capital accounting; referenced by investors connecting sustainability disclosures to financial statements.

Why it matters

The six-capitals vocabulary is the dominant grammar for describing multi-capital value creation; defining financial capital precisely anchors the rest of the capitals cluster.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.

No verified experts yet

Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for verification and necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.