Energy policy

Feed-in premium (FIP)

A renewable-energy support scheme that pays a premium on top of the market price, leaving producers exposed to market signals.

Established · Version 0.1

Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yet

Definition

A feed-in premium is a support mechanism in which renewable electricity generators sell their output on the market and receive an additional premium per unit on top of the wholesale price. The premium may be fixed (constant per MWh) or floating, varying with the market price to stabilise total remuneration within a band. Unlike the feed-in tariff, which replaces the market price with a guaranteed administratively set tariff, the premium model keeps producers exposed to price signals, encouraging output when electricity is most valuable. European energy regulators (CEER) catalogued the FIP alongside feed-in tariffs, green certificates and investment grants as principal renewable-support schemes.

References

Emissions-EUETS.com

premium on top of wholesale price, fixed vs floating design, CEER catalogue of support schemes

Synertics

market exposure under FIPs, relationship to PPAs, policy migration from FiTs

Overview

What it means

FIPs are the halfway house between full subsidy and full merchant exposure: they de-risk investment enough to unlock finance while pushing operators toward market-responsive behaviour. Many EU states have migrated from tariffs to premiums or contracts for difference as renewables matured.

How it is used

Used in EU renewable-energy policy, auction design and corporate PPA structures as a reference for market-integrated support.

Why it matters

The choice between tariff, premium and merchant models determines how much market risk clean-energy investors bear — and therefore the cost of capital and speed of deployment.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.

No verified experts yet

Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for verification and necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.