Development · social

Extreme Poverty

Living below the international poverty line — currently $3.00 per person per day in 2021 purchasing-power-parity dollars.

Established · Version 0.1

Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yet

Definition

Extreme poverty denotes living below the World Bank's international poverty line (IPL), a threshold derived from the median of national poverty lines of low-income countries and expressed in purchasing-power-parity terms. Following the Bank's adoption of 2021 PPPs, the line stands at $3.00 per person per day; it replaced the $2.15 line (2017 PPP), which in turn succeeded earlier lines traced back to the original "$1 a day" measure of 1990. Higher lines of $4.20 and $8.30 (2021 PPP) are used as typical thresholds for lower-middle- and upper-middle-income countries. Eradicating extreme poverty by 2030 is the first target of SDG 1.

References

Our World in Data

$3.00/day line in 2021 international-$, median-of-low-income-lines method, $4.20/$8.30 higher lines

tutor2u

$2.15/day (2017 PPP) predecessor line, $6.85 upper-middle reference, history from $1/day (1990)

Overview

What it means

The IPL is an absolute floor, not a measure of national poverty: it fixes the real consumption level below which a person anywhere is counted as extremely poor, enabling global counting and trend tracking. Because the line is periodically revised with new PPP data, figures from different vintages ($2. 15 vs $3. 00) are not directly comparable without restated series.

How it is used

Used in SDG monitoring, World Bank poverty measurement, development-finance allocation and evaluation of poverty-reduction programmes.

Why it matters

It is the world's headline deprivation metric, anchoring the 2030 Agenda and concentrating attention on the populations furthest behind.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.

No verified experts yet

Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for verification and necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.