Governance · social
Executive compensation
The complete package of salary, incentives, benefits and perquisites paid to senior executives, set and overseen by the board's remuneration committee.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
Executive compensation is the total remuneration provided to an organisation's senior executives, conventionally comprising base salary, short-term (annual) incentives, long-term incentives such as shares and options, employee benefits, and perquisites, together with deferred and severance arrangements. Packages are normally determined by an independent remuneration (compensation) committee of the board, benchmarked against peer companies and tied to performance metrics — increasingly including ESG and sustainability targets.
References
five-component structure (base pay, short-term incentives, long-term incentives, benefits, perquisites) plus deferred compensation
independent compensation committee role, metrics including ESG targets
total direct compensation terminology and benchmarking practice
Overview
What it means
Pay structure shapes executive behaviour: the weighting between fixed salary and variable, performance-linked awards determines what leaders optimise for. Linking long-term incentives to multi-year sustainability metrics (emissions, safety, diversity) is intended to align executive reward with durable value creation, though weak targets can turn ESG pay into a reputational rather than behavioural instrument.
How it is used
Disclosed in remuneration reports and proxy statements; voted on by shareholders ("say on pay"); analysed by investors as a governance signal and by regulators as a risk-taking control.
Why it matters
Incentive design is one of the strongest levers boards have over corporate sustainability performance; ESG-linked pay is now a standard investor engagement question and a test of whether commitments are backed by consequences.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.