Sustainability measurement & disclosure
ESRS S4
The European Sustainability Reporting Standard setting disclosure requirements on consumers and end-users.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
ESRS S4 is the topical European Sustainability Reporting Standard on consumers and end-users, adopted under Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772. It covers material impacts of the undertaking's products and services on consumers and end-users — including information-related impacts (privacy, security, manipulation), personal safety, and social inclusion such as access and non-discrimination.
References
standard scope, phase-in
Delegated Regulation 2023/2772, first set
Overview
What it means
S4 applies the common ESRS structure to downstream impacts, requiring policies, engagement, actions and targets regarding consumer health, safety, data and accessibility. Full application benefits from phase-in provisions to financial years from 2027 for first-wave reporters. It is typically material for consumer goods, digital services, finance and health sectors.
How it is used
Used by CSRD reporters to disclose product-responsibility impacts; connects to consumer-protection, product-safety and data-protection law.
Why it matters
S4 extends mandatory sustainability disclosure to what products and services do to people — beyond factory gates.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.