Sustainability measurement & disclosure
ESRS S2
The European Sustainability Reporting Standard setting disclosure requirements on workers in the value chain.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
ESRS S2 is the topical European Sustainability Reporting Standard on workers in the value chain, adopted under Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772. It covers material impacts on workers outside the undertaking's own workforce — in upstream and downstream value chains — including working conditions, forced and child labour, health and safety, and adequate wages at suppliers.
References
standard scope, phase-in
Delegated Regulation 2023/2772, first set
Overview
What it means
S2 requires disclosure of policies, engagement processes, actions and targets concerning value-chain workers, closely tracking the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and due-diligence legislation. Full application benefits from phase-in provisions to financial years from 2027 for first-wave reporters.
How it is used
Used by CSRD reporters with material supply-chain labour risks — notably apparel, electronics, agriculture and extractives; dovetails with CSDDD obligations.
Why it matters
S2 makes supply-chain labour conditions a regulated disclosure object, operationalising human-rights due diligence in reporting.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.