Sustainability measurement & disclosure
ESRS S1
The European Sustainability Reporting Standard setting disclosure requirements on a company's own workforce.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
ESRS S1 is the topical European Sustainability Reporting Standard on own workforce, adopted under Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772. It covers working conditions, equal treatment and opportunities, and other work-related rights for the undertaking's employees and non-employee workers, including health and safety, work-life balance, remuneration, collective bargaining and diversity.
References
standard scope, phased sub-disclosures
Delegated Regulation 2023/2772, first set
Overview
What it means
S1 is the broadest social standard, with disclosures on workforce characteristics, policies, actions, targets and metrics (including adequate wages, social protection, training, and incidents). Certain sub-disclosures (e. g. non-EEA workforce data, some adequacy metrics) benefit from phase-in provisions. It is effectively material for nearly all reporters.
How it is used
Used by CSRD reporters for workforce disclosure; connects to GRI 400-series, human-capital frameworks and EU social legislation.
Why it matters
S1 sets the mandatory baseline for corporate workforce transparency in the EU — the core of the 'S' in ESG.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.